Legal Opinion

Eisner v. Williams

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1941No. Docket No. 29, Calendar No. 41,539PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

The principal question presented by this appeal is whether the circuit judge was in error in dismissing plaintiffs’ and appellants’ suit in chancery as against one of the defendants, Henry Elliot Williams, appellee.

Plaintiffs are the liquidating trustees of the Port Lauderdale Eeal Estate Company, a Florida corporation. The corporation retained upon a 25 per cent, contingent fee a New York firm of attorneys to institute suit in Florida against defendant Anna Dodge Dillman ancl others. The New York law firm, having express authority so to do, retained defendant Williams as associate counsel,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cofrode v. GartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Newland v. ReillyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State ex rel. Bowling Green Trust Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. Williams v. FischleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. H. Williamson, Ltd. v. Phinney-Walker Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Lawrence M Clarke, Inc v. Richco Construction, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Ooley v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Legg v. BarinagaIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Chesnow v. NadellMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API