Legal Opinion

The Bailey Gatzert

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 29, 1909No. 4,979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit for collision.

1Opinion of the Court

WOLyVERTON, District Judge.

On the morning of November G, 1907, the libelant was engaged in deepening the channel of the Willamette river, at a point nearly opposite the head of what is known as ‘Willamette' slough.” The work was being prosecuted by means of the dredge Portland. It was found necessary, for the convenient and successful doing of the work, to anchor the dredge directly in the fairway. This was done by means of a spud and anchors, attached’ to cables on board. The vessel in its operation swung forward and back; the spud acting as a pivot in a radius of 150 feet. While so anchored…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan S. S. Co. v. VanderbiltCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
  2. Adams v. BoliviaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1891
  3. Hunter v. Dampskibsselskabet TellusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  4. The KentuckyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1906
  5. Nealley v. The MichiganDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Kaga MaruDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1927
  2. The FullertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API