Legal Opinion

Reckley v. Zenn

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1914PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Tucker County. Action by W. E. Reekley against Phillip Zenn and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

RobiNSON, Judge :

Plaintiff claims recovery under an alleged verbal contract with defendants, partners as the Elk Lick Lumber Company. Defendants submit that a contract is not proved, and that in any event the alleged contract is within the statute of frauds as one not to be performed within a year. On these grounds they seek a reversal of the judgment which plaintiff obtained below.

The evidence on the question as to whether the alleged contract was actually entered into by a meeting of the minds .of the parties is conflicting oral testimony involving the credibility of witnesses who testified…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warner v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Miller v. WisenerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StuckeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wood & Brooks Co. v. D. E. Hewit Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. McClanahan v. Otto-Marmet Coal & Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Brown v. Western Maryland Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Alkire v. Orchard Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API