Legal Opinion
Shockey v. Fouty
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 1995No. 95CA2101PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
Inmate Michael E. Shockey appeals from a judgment of the Ross County Court of Common Pleas which dismissed his civil rights complaint against several employees of the Ohio Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. He assigns the following error:
“The trial court erred to the prejudice of plaintiff-appellant in dismissing his claims authorized by 42 U.S.C., Section 1983.”
Inmate Shockey filed a complaint under Section 1983, Title 42, U.S. Code, seeking declaratory judgment, injunctive relief and money damages for alleged violations of his due process rights in conjunction with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Crestmont Cleveland Partnership v. Ohio Department of HealthOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Roll v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Glazer v. Chase Home Fin., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- McGuffey v. Lenscrafters, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Gary Phillips & Associates v. Ameritech Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.