Legal Opinion

Smith v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1979No. Civ. 17150PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARAS, J.

This is a petition for peremptory writ of mandate (or prohibition) to require the respondent Superior Court of Siskiyou County to afford petitioner a jury trial.

The State of California, acting through the Department of Transportation (hereinafter plaintiff), brought suit in the small claims division of the Yreka Judicial District against petitioner (hereinafter defendant), seeking the sum of $491.90 damages to a road sign allegedly caused by defendant’s negligent operation of a motor vehicle. Following trial, judgment was entered for plaintiff. Defendant appealed to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Highland Realty Co. v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. FrangadakisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Perez v. City of San BrunoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Crouchman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hebert v. HarnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Maldonado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API