Boley v. Larson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
On the first trial of this personal injury action, the court sustained defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case to the jury. On appeal, this court reversed and granted a new trial, concluding that the evidence and the inferences therefrom were sufficient to warrant the submission of the issue of negligence to the jury. Further, the court held that it could not say that plaintiff was chargeable with contributory negligence as a matter of law. Boley v. Larson, 62 Wn.2d 959, 385 P.2d 326 (1963). Quoted with approval in Allen v. Fish, 64…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Rettinger v. BresnahanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Ulve v. City of RaymondWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Vangemert v. McCalmonWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Reynolds v. PhareWashington Supreme Court · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Turner v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Hammond v. BradenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Hayden v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Arturo R. Moreno, Personal Representative of Oswaldo Moreno, Deceased v. Stahmann Farms, Inc., a New Mexico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Nelson v. BlakeWashington Supreme Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.