Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 17, 1979No. SPCM 13343PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DeFORD, Judge:

The appellant, contrary to his pleas, was convicted of larceny and burglary in violation of Articles 121 and 129, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 921 and 929. His approved sentence included a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months, and reduction to the grade of Private (E-l).

On appeal, appellant has assigned five errors that he believes justify reversal of his conviction. The Court finds only one error meritorious for the reasons hereafter set forth.

During the night of 7-8 October 1977 at Fort Rucker, Alabama,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. MorrisArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  3. United States v. HagenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
  4. United States v. MelansonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  5. United States v. HallArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API