Legal Opinion

In re Gomez

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 2010No. G043001PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

In his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, petitioner challenges the decisions made by the Governor in 2009 and 2010, to reverse the findings of the Board of Parole Hearings (the Board) that he was suitable for parole in November 2008 and November 2009 (his fifth and sixth parole hearings).

In reversing the findings of the Board, the Governor determined petitioner’s release on parole posed an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety based on two grounds. First, the Governor found the second degree murder committed by petitioner was especially atrocious and heinous.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In re ShaputisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In Re PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In Re PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re ShaputisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In re LiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. In re RynerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. In re HguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. In Re ShaputisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API