Legal Opinion

Betzold v. Sherwin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 21, 1987No. C6-86-1506PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. Appellants claim the trial court erred when it (1) excised a portion of a medical record, (2) added the word “construct” to its instruction on negligence and to the special verdict form, (3) refused to give appellants’ requested instruction on assumption of risk, (4) gave an instruction on duty to warn, and (5) sent only a portion of the instructions to the jury in writing. Respondent appeals from the trial court’s denial of a motion for prejudgment interest…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Matter of Conservatorship of TorresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Peterson v. WT Rawleigh CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baber v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Taney v. Independent School District No. 624Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Chizmadia v. Smiley's Point ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  4. Chizmadia v. Smiley's Point ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. Goswitz v. FiedlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API