Legal Opinion

People v. Tunstall

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Norman J. Felig, J.

The defendants herein, James Tunstall and Robert Chamberlin, were convicted, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the third degree on Richmond County indictment No. 248/79. Tunstall was sentenced on July 18, 1980 (Di Vernieri, J.), and on the appeal from the ensuing judgment of conviction, the Appellate Division, Second Department, in an order dated October 24, 1983, reversed the judgment and ordered a new trial to be preceded by a pretrial hearing "to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. TunstallNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. TunstallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. PantaleoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988
  2. People v. ChamberlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API