Legal Opinion

Caddy v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 1994No. CV92-0100; CA A78258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of defendant on their claim that defendant negligently failed to procure a policy of insurance for them. We reverse and remand.

We view the facts from the record on summary judgment in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the non-moving parties. Gaston v. Parsons, 318 Or 247, 251, 864 P2d 1319 (1994).

Plaintiffs were building their own home. Defendant is an insurance agent. Plaintiff Lance Caddy spoke to an employee of defendant’s about obtaining insurance coverage for potential liability related to the construction of the house.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Joseph Forest Products, Inc. v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kabban v. MacKinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Precision Castparts Corp. v. Johnson & Higgins of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Larson v. Transamerica Life & Annuity InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. AlbrechtUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Harris v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  4. Harris v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API