Legal Opinion

Edmunds v. Kraner

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2006No. 30862PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

Appellants James (James) and Janice (Janice) Edmunds (collectively “the Edmunds”) filed a complaint against numerous defendants, including Respondent St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center (StAlphonsus). The Edmunds allege that overdoses of the antibiotic Gentamicin administered while James was a patient at St. Alphonsus led to neurotoxicity and ototoxicity and resulted in James being totally and permanently disabled. Shortly before trial St. Alphonsus moved for summary judgment, which the district court granted. This case comes to this Court on the Edmunds’ appeal from that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Perry v. Magic Valley Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dulaney v. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Kolln v. Saint Luke's Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Clark v. KleinIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. Erik Virgil HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Easterling v. Kendall, M.D.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Papin v. PapinIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Thomson v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Partout v. HarperIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API