Legal Opinion

E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Bentley

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 2, 1927No. 357PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition alleged no connection of the petitioner with the vessels, except as shown by the charter party, .together with the fact that he used them to carry the powder. It must appear from the pleading itself that the petitioner is a charterer of the kind described in the statute, and here it is too plain for discussion that the charter party did not make him such. Smith v. Booth (D. C.) 110 F. 680. Whether other facts might bring him within the statute we need not inquire. We must go by the pleading. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Insurance Co. v. So. Pac. Ry. (February 21,1927) 47 S. Ct.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. MellorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. The Erie Lighter 108District Court, D. New Jersey · 1918
  4. In re Eastern Dredging Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1905
  5. Smith v. BoothDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. The SeveranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  2. In Re Complaint of Barracuda Tanker Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. McHugh v. Gleneagle Ship Management Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  4. Diamond S. S. Transp. Corp. v. Peoples Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  5. Star Brick Corporation v. Oscar Johnson, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API