Legal Opinion

Garniss v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1891No. 14160PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of review to annul a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco rendered upon appeal from the justice’s court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Application for writ of review.

The facts set out in petitioner’s application are as follows: “That one Horace W. Philbrook, upon the fifteenth day of April, 1890, commenced an action against the petitioner in the justice’s court of the city and county of San Francisco upon a complaint stating, among other things, ‘that on the twenty-ninth day of May, 1889, in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, a civil action was commenced by Edward Harrison, administrator, et al., against Mary J. Lynch et al., for the purpose of recovering from said Mary J. Lynch a certain lot of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jogani v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Pacific Bank v. Madera Fruit & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Steele v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API