Legal Opinion

Kalgaard v. Lindo Mar Adventure Club, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 12, 1997No. 9404-02951; CA A91802PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on defendant’s counterclaim for intentional interference with a prospective business relationship. We conclude that there is a genuine issue of material fact, ORCP 47 C, and therefore reverse and remand.

On review of a summary judgment, we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences to be drawn from it in the light most favorable to defendant, the nonmoving party. Stoeger v. Burlington Northern Railroad Co., 323 Or 569, 572, 919 P2d 39 (1996). Defendant is an Oregon corporation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. RoseOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Yates v. LargeOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Downs v. Waremart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Stoeger v. Burlington Northern RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Highland Enterprises, Inc. v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Arlington Education Ass'n v. Arlington School District No. 3Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Aginsky v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2005
  4. Logan v. West Coast Benson HotelDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1997
  5. Rotec Industries, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API