Legal Opinion
Aginsky v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 27, 2005No. 05-291-KIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KING, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Arkady Aginsky and Sharlota Aginsky 1 claim defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange (“Farmers”) breached an insurance contract. Before me is Farmers’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 8). For the following reasons, I grant Farmers’ motion for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
On November 27, 1996, Farmers issued a property insurance policy to cover an apartment building owned by the plaintiffs. At the time the policy was issued, the apartment had in place a permanent roof. In early 2003, plaintiffs decided to re-roof one of their three apartment buildings…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Billie J. Preaseau v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Camden F.I. Assn. v. N.B v. Hotel Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1946
- Victory Peach Group, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dewsnup v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Lobell v. Graphic Arts Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Dewsnup v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Cedar Ridge, LLC v. Landmark American InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
- Dewsnup v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.