Legal Opinion
Irish v. Pulliam
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the district court for Douglas county. Heard below before Wakeley, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.
Pulliam, Dickey & Paul entered into a contract with Allen H. Fitch to erect a dwelling house for him and his wife in the city of Omaha, for the sum of $7,244. The contractors could not, or at least did not, enter into a bond for the completion of the building according to the plans and specifications, and to pay the laborers and material-men. - In lieu of this, however, the Fitehs allege in their answer to the petition: “ That said Pulliam, Dickey & Co. *25were the lowest bidders therefor, bidding to do said work according to the plans and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morrill v. Tehama Consolidated Mill & Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1875
- Eads v. City of CarondeletSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Hough v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Methudy v. RossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
- Bourne v. ShapleighMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Universal Products Co. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1935
- Mercer v. Payne & Sons Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1927
- Alexandria Billiard Co. v. MiloslowskySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Goodwin v. FreadrichNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- T. C. Bottom Produce Co. v. OlsenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915