Methudy v. Ross
Missouri Court of Appeals
Error to the St. Louis Circuit Court, Boyle, J.
1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.
This is an action for damages for breach of contract of sale of a lot of lumber. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and the finding and judgment were for defendants.
The evidence showed that plaintiffs were lumber dealers in St. Louis; defendants were also lumber dealers, and one *102Leahey was a person engaged in logging. On September 6, 1879, Leahey owned a large quantity, altogether about two million six hundred thousand feet, of lumber, at Wausau, Wisconsin, of which a part was in logs in the river at that place, marked with Leahe3’s mark, and part dry lumber in piles. Defendants…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
- Universal Products Co. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1935
- Pfaff v. GruenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Hudson v. RodgersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Irish v. PulliamNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.