Legal Opinion

Methudy v. Ross

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the St. Louis Circuit Court, Boyle, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

This is an action for damages for breach of contract of sale of a lot of lumber. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and the finding and judgment were for defendants.

The evidence showed that plaintiffs were lumber dealers in St. Louis; defendants were also lumber dealers, and one *102Leahey was a person engaged in logging. On September 6, 1879, Leahey owned a large quantity, altogether about two million six hundred thousand feet, of lumber, at Wausau, Wisconsin, of which a part was in logs in the river at that place, marked with Leahe3’s mark, and part dry lumber in piles. Defendants…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
  2. Universal Products Co. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1935
  3. Pfaff v. GruenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Hudson v. RodgersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Irish v. PulliamNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API