Gates v. New York Life Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, J.
Plaintiffs commenced suit against defendant insurance company, as beneficiaries of a life *25insurance policy on the life of the deceased, alleging that the death of the insured, their, son, was “accidental” under the terms of the insurance ■ policy, and therefore, they were entitled to an additional $5,000 arising out of the double indemnity provisions of the policy. It is to be noted that the defendant company before the institution of the suit paid the face amount of the policy which was $5,000.
A jury trial was commenced in Benzie county circuit court by the plaintiffs. At the close.of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hooper v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Furbush v. Maryland Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Rosenberg v. MagedaMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Turner v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Dimmer v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grandchamp v. PatzerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Gates v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969