Legal Opinion

Dimmer v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1938No. Docket No. 84, Calendar No. 40,134PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiff, as beneficiary, brought suit against defendant on a life insurance policy which, in addition to a death benefit of $1,000, provided for double indemnity if death were caused solely by external, violent and accidental means. Under stipulation of the parties, the death benefit of $1,000 was paid without prejudice to the right to recover the additional $1,000 if death were caused by accident. The sole issue tried in the lower court was whether death was caused by suicide or by accident.

The circumstances surrounding decedent’s death are not clear. About 9 a. m. Sunday, October 6, 1935,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. New York Life Insurance v. GamerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. PrietoTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Arnold v. KrugMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Nichols v. New York Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Epstein v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Hooper v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Turner v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. RosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Hume v. Standard Life and Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API