Shattuck v. Grider
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Judge:
This is an application for habeas corpus wherein Bruce Shattuck, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, alleges that his constitutional rights have been violated and the State of Oklahoma has broken its contract with petitioner in canceling out certain credits for blood donations made by petitioner prior to his release on parole.
Although petitioner does not state how much blood time he accrued prior to his release and before the revocation of his parole for its violation, he has substantially raised the question .of whether an inmate who contributes blood prior to his release on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Board of Ed. v. MorleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- McCoy v. HarrisUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Zeiner v. ZeinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Hime v. City of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Jones v. ClemmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Porter v. FerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Harris v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Whirlpool Corp. v. HenryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Robinson v. State Stove & Mfg. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Opinion No. (1985), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.