Legal Opinion
United States v. Brickey
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
Decided January 29, 1980No. SPCM 13754PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FULTON, Senior Judge:
The appellant, Specialist Brickey, was tried by a special court-martial for soliciting another soldier (Private Brown) to wrongfully possess marihuana in October 1977; for wrongfully possessing and transferring (to the same Private Brown) methamphetamine on 28 January 1978; and for wrongfully possessing and selling methamphetamine on 4 February 1978. Brickey was acquitted of the solicitation charge, but was convicted of wrongfully possessing and transferring methamphetamine on 28 January 1978 in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- Alfred Coles v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BrickeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. KoonceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. GroothoffU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981