Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 6, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

The complaint, which has been dismissed for insufficiency, alleges that the parties here entered into a written lease under which defendant leased to plaintiff a suite in the R. K. 0. Building for ten years and two months at an annual rental of $1,080. The lease contained a provision permitting its assignment by plaintiff, upon certain conditions, to a corporation to be organized. The conditions required assumption of the lease by the assignee; the continuance of plaintiff's liability thereunder; the control by plaintiff of the assignee corporation by means of ownership of at least a majority…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Bonbright & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Rockefeller Purchasing Corp. v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Rockefeller Purchasing Corp. v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garvin v. Teachers' Retirement BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Mitchell v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1940
  3. Weiner v. PruzanNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API