Legal Opinion

Weiner v. Pruzan

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1958Published

1Opinion of the CourtCharles J. Beckinella, J.

In an action to restrain defendant union from picketing plaintiff’s business and for damages plaintiff moves for an injunction pendente lite. Tbe defendant cross-moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action and on the further ground that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Since the institution of the motion plaintiff has signed a collective bargaining agreement with the defendant and the *669picketing has ceased. The motion for a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goodwins, Inc. v. HagedornNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Tennessee v. CondonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Nevins, Inc. v. KasmachNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Gueutal v. GueutalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. King v. Krischer Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API