Legal Opinion

Victor Havas and Arlene Havas v. John T. Thornton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 26, 1979No. 77-3139PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMESON, District Judge:

Victor Havas and Arlene Havas, his wife, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 1 and 1985, 2 for damages and in-junctive relief, claiming a conspiracy to deprive them of their civil rights to liberty, property, and due process of law. They named as defendants various officials of the State of Nevada and Clark County, Nevada, and members and officers of the Metropolitan Police Department of Clark County, together with the City of Las Vegas, Clark County, and the State of Nevada. They appeal from a judgment dismissing the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Mark Cook v. Roberta Sheldon and Nelson Saldana, New York State TroopersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Thomas R. Rutherford v. City of BerkeleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Dorothy Stevens v. Dorothy Wright TillmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Spear v. Town of West HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Spear v. Town of West HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API