Steven Fue v. Martin Biter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Dissent.by Judge BYBEE.
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
California state prisoner Steven Pelesa-sa Fue (Fue) appeals the district court’s dismissal, as untimely, of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (the Act), 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Fue contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling because the state court never notified him that it had denied his state-habeas petition. The district court held that Fue was not entitled to equitable tolling because he did not act diligently in waiting fourteen…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Armando Sossa v. Ralph M. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Michael Lacava v. Kenneth D. Kyler the District Attorney for Philadelphia County the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Ramirez v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Diaz v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Ralph Miller v. Terry Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Steven Fue v. Martin BiterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016