Legal Opinion

Steven Fue v. Martin Biter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 15, 2016No. 12-55307PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Dissent.by Judge BYBEE.

OPINION

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:

California state prisoner Steven Pelesa-sa Fue (Fue) appeals the district court’s dismissal, as untimely, of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (the Act), 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Fue contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling because the state court never notified him that it had denied his state-habeas petition. The district court held that Fue was not entitled to equitable tolling because he did not act diligently in waiting fourteen…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Armando Sossa v. Ralph M. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Michael Lacava v. Kenneth D. Kyler the District Attorney for Philadelphia County the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Ramirez v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Diaz v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Ralph Miller v. Terry Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steven Fue v. Martin BiterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API