Legal Opinion
Steven Fue v. Martin Biter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 17, 2016No. 12-55307PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BYBEE, Circuit Judge:
After the California Supreme Court denied Steven Fue’s direct appeal from his conviction for carjacking, Fue had one year in which to file a federal habeas corpus petition. Instead, Fue filed a state habeas petition, which tolled the time for filing his federal petition. When Fue finally filed his federal habeas petition, the district court dismissed it as untimely. Fue argues that he is entitled to equitable tolling because the California Supreme Court never notified him that it had denied his state petition. We hold that Fue’s lack of knowledge of the denial, if…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Willie Lee Miles v. K.W. Prunty, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Sergey Spitsyn v. Robert Moore, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Armando Sossa v. Ralph M. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Anthony Smith v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Willie Grant v. Gary SwarthoutCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Willie Jackson v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Thomas Milam v. Kelly HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Juan Valenzuela v. L. SmallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.