Legal Opinion

Long v. Somervell

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

Plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings (Civ. Prac. Act, § 476 and Rules Civ. Prac. rule 112) in favor of the plaintiff on plaintiff’s first cause of action, on the ground that the answer interposed herein by the defendant is insufficient in law on the face thereof with respect to the said first cause of action, and for an order (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 109, subd. 6) striking out the partial affirmative defense contained in the answer on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it is insufficient in law.

Plaintiff, a citizen and resident of the city, was a stenographer in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Jeffrey Manufacturing Co. v. BlaggSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Carlos Herrera, Victor Hugo Herrera, and Felipe Santiago Herrera, A/k/a"chiquito"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. People v. ParkerNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1955
  3. Long v. SomervellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Stewart v. StraussCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API