Gronquist v. Department of Licensing
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Van Deren, J.*
¶1 Derek E. Gronquist appeals from the trial court’s summary judgment order in favor of the Department of Licensing on Gronquist’s Public Records Act (PRA)1 claim. Gronquist argues that the trial court erred when it granted Licensing’s summary judgment motion because (1) Licensing failed to respond within five business days of his PRA request, thus entitling him to penalties; (2) the information Licensing redacted from a master business license application was not exempt from disclosure under the PRA; (3) Licensing failed to provide explanations for each redaction, also…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hobbs v. Washington State Auditor's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Block v. City of Gold BarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP v. Office of Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Anne Block v. City Of Gold BarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Contreraz v. City of TacomaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.