Legal Opinion

Block v. City of Gold Bar

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 22, 2015No. 71425-2-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Cox, J.

The Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW, requires a government agency to conduct an adequate search for responsive records to a public records request. The agency must then disclose records responsive to the request and either produce such records for inspection and copying or withhold them. The agency may lawfully withhold a record only if it is exempt.1

*267¶2 In this case, Anne Block made two public records requests to the City of Gold Bar. The City produced certain records and either completely or partially withheld others, which it identified as exempt in two separate…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Michael Meeropol, A/K/A Rosenberg v. Edwin Meese Iii, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  4. Limstrom v. LadenburgWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rebecca A. Rufin, Appellant, v. the City of Seattle, RespondentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. Kittitas County v. Sky AllphinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Frontier Bank v. Bingo Investments, Appellant'sCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. David O'dea, Resp/cross App V. City Of Tacoma, Apps/cross RespsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. Block v. City of Gold BarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API