Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Gedko v. Heer
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 27, 1975No. 74-C-301PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES E. DOYLE, District Judge.
Petitioner has exhausted his state court remedies within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
I accept and adopt the findings made by the state court and embodied in the “proposed findings of fact” set forth in the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate.
The directions from the Supreme Court of the United States and the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit are indistinct. However, it appears that the clearest directions are to be found in United States v. Katz, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) and United States v. Case, 435…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Earnest Jackson, Jr., and James Arthur Porter, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Pueblo v. LebrónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1979
- State v. LakinTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. DeBackerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
- United States v. Ray E. Oliver, A/K/A Edward Ray OliverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.