Legal Opinion

United States v. Earnest Jackson, Jr., and James Arthur Porter, III

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 7, 1979No. 77-5707PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge:

Following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, appellants Earnest Jackson, Jr., and James Arthur Porter, III, were convicted under a two-count indictment of violating the federal narcotics laws. Count One charged appellants with conspiracy to distribute approximately 934.5 grams of heroin, a Schedule I controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Count Two charged appellants with possession of heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). 1 In their principal argument…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. United States v. BrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Calixto Agapito, Martha Calderon and Horacio RuedaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Darlie Kee Darin Routier v. City of Rowlett Texas Jimmy Ray Patterson Chris Frosch Greg Davis, Assistant District Attorney for Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API