Legal Opinion

Shackelford v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided February 5, 1982No. Civ. A. No. W-80-CA-235PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NOWLIN, District Judge.

The Court has before it Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order filed on February 1, 1982. Plaintiff’s motion requests, for a number of reasons, that the Court issue a protective order preventing the deposition of Plaintiff’s expert, Gary Robinson, noticed by Defendant for February 6, 1982. Among the arguments raised by the Plaintiff in support of the motion for protective order is that the Defendant has failed to file a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4)(A)(ii) requesting leave to take Plaintiff’s expert’s deposition.

Plaintiff’s point is well taken. Rule 26(b)(4)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harry E. Hoover v. The United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. North Georgia Lumber & Hardware v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matthews v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  2. Oneida, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  3. Swann v. City of GoldsboroDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1990
  4. Stella v. Spaulding and Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  5. Stella v. Spaulding and Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API