Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stella v. Spaulding and Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 1, 2013No. 2011-327Published

1Dissent

Robinson, J.,

¶ 23. dissenting. The issue in this case is not whether defendants were entitled to the information they sought through the ordinary course of discovery; rather, the question presented is whether they got the information they were entitled to get through the particular tool of expert interrogatories pursuant to Vermont Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4)(A)(i). In affirming the trial court, the majority applies a far more exacting standard than the rule supports. Moreover, the trial court’s sanction for the purported discovery violation, which was tantamount to dismissal of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Lillian Weiss v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. John v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  4. McAdams v. Town of BarnardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Workman v. ChinchinianDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API