Legal Opinion
Steve Lucsik v. Board of Education of the Brunswick City School District
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 22, 1980No. 79-3243PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal arises from the jailing of Lucsik and his colleagues by a state court for contempt. Alleging that certain actions of counsel for the Brunswick, Ohio, City School District during the contempt proceedings deprived them of constitutional rights, the contemnors sued the Brunswick Board of Education, the Superintendent and the members of the Board for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The District Court dismissed their complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
Lucsik and his colleagues were teachers who struck the Brunswick School District in April, 1978.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States Steel Corp. v. United Mine WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Buddy Systems, Inc., a California Corporation v. Exer-Genie, Inc., a Corporation, and E. E. HolkesvickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United Motors Service, Inc. v. Tropic-Aire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Adolph Coors Company, Cross-Appellant v. A & S Wholesalers, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roger McMaster v. Cabinet for Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Philips Business Systems, Inc. v. Executive Communications Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Philips Business Systems, Inc. v. Executive Business Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1983
- Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012
- Grove v. GroomeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.