Legal Opinion
Roger McMaster v. Cabinet for Human Resources
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1987No. 86-5606PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COHN, District Judge.
I
This is an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 claiming violation of substantive due process rights because of malicious prosecution. Also involved are pendent state claims for malicious prosecution and, apparently, for defamation and intentional infliction of mental distress.
Appellants (one deceased), plaintiffs below, worked for the Cabinet for Human Resources, a Kentucky agency responsible in part for the care of juvenile delinquents. Following a highly publicized death of a juvenile under questionable circumstances, *519they were suspended “for cause” on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Norman Braley v. City of Pontiac, Stanley Helgemo, Sergeant Arthur Rouse and Roland Garcia, OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Louis Cale v. J.R. Johnson, Warden, F.C.I., James Wahl, Food Service Administrator, F.C.I., Milan, and Melvin Persky, Inmate and Clerk to James WahlCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- James L. McCune v. The City of Grand Rapids, a Municipal Corporation Francis Pierce Gerald Steele John Doe and Richard RoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Everett Perry v. Kenneth McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Easton v. SundramCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.