Legal Opinion

Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided April 24, 2012No. Civil Action Nos. 5:02-571, 5:04-84PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Wrongful Injunction Damages in Case No. 5:02-CV-571-GFVT [R. 1473] filed by Static Control Components, Inc. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted, and Static Control will *802be awarded damages in the amount of the injunction bond previously set by the Court.1

I

In December of 2002, Lexmark International, Inc., filed suit against Static Control in Civil Action No. 02-571. Lexmark asserted claims of copyright infringement and claims under the Digital Millennium…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. Moltan Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Aluminum Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Local Union No. 215 v. Consolidated Aluminum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. v. Furstenau, Jr.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  2. Stratesphere LLC v. Kognetics Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API