Legal Opinion

Delinquent Tax-List v. Territory of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1894No. Civil No. 353PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. R. E. Sloan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.

The appeal is taken from a judgment for delinquent taxes for the years 1889 and 1891. The objectors, Maish and Driscoll, urge a number of reasons why the taxes are invalid. They relate mostly to the manner of assessing the taxes, preparing and returning the delinquent list, and similar questions; all of which we deem mere irregularities, and covered by paragraph 2688 of the Revised Statutes, which was in force at the time of judgment. As to all of these objections we are content with the reasons given in the case of Atlantic and Pacific R. R. Co. v. Yavapai County, 3 Ariz. 117, 21 Pac. 768,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colorado Co. v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Territory of Arizona v. Delinquent Tax-ListArizona Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. PattersonMontana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hale & Norcross Gold & Silver Mining Co. v. Storey CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1865
  5. People v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Airport Properties v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Maricopa County v. Fox Riverside Theatre Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. WattsArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Wyoming Central Irrigation Co. v. FarlowWyoming Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API