Legal Opinion

People v. Donnelly

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 7,352PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of Sacramento County.

1Opinion of the Court

McKinstry, J.:

Action to recover a tax levied in 1873. The answer, as an affirmative defense, contained the following:

*145“ That on or about the month of January, 1871, the State of California, plaintiff herein, was the owner and in possession of the lots of land described in the complaint, the same being salt marsh and tide lands.
“ That on or about the said month of January, 1871, the Board of Tide Land Commissioners, duly appointed and commissioned under and by virtue of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, entitled 1 An Act to Survey and Dispose of Certain' Salt Marsh and Tide…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Cent.l Pac. R.R. Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Slade v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. Delinquent Tax-List v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API