Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hale & Norcross Gold & Silver Mining Co. v. Storey County

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1865PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from tlie District Court of the First Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Storey County, Hon. Caleb BuebakK presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The only cases cited were 12 Cal., Slate of California v. Moore, p. 56; and-22 Cal., People v. Morrison, p. 78; sec. 6 of Organic Act; sec. 1, art. X. of •Constitution, and the various sections of the Revenue Act bearing on the points in the case.

1Concurrence

Opinion by

Beatty-, J.,

full Bench concurring.

This was a complaint in equity filed by the plaintiff for the purpose of restraining the officers of Storey County from the collection of certain taxes which are alleged to be illegally assessed.

The defendants demur on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

But there is a stipulation in the transcript that the sole question to be raised or determined in the case is the “ legality of the tax imposed under the revenue laws of the Territory of Nevada.”

With this stipulation on the record, we will…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gillett v. GaffneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  2. Goldfield Consolidated Mines Co. v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  3. T Peka Commercial Security Co. v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  4. Delinquent Tax-List v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State v. C. P. R. R. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API