Legal Opinion

Malcolm MacDowell & Associates, Inc. v. Ecorse-Lincoln Park Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1949No. Docket No. 2, Calendar No. 44,276PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiff’s declaration contained 2 .counts sounding on express contract, the first of which was abandoned at trial. The second count alleged that in July, 1940, defendant’s predecessor bank was an approved mortgagee under the national housing' act and, as such, eligible to sell its mortgages insured by the National Housing Adminis tration to the Federal National Mortgage Association, hereinafter called FNMA, under a contract between them whereunder the bank retained the right to service the mortgages thus sold to FNMA and receive from the latter a servicing fee of 16f per cent, of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. McCreery v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Price v. Spielman Motor Sales Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. Brawley v. Crosby Research Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Americana Hotel, Inc. v. ZableDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Crystal Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Crystal Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API