Crystal Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentStein, District Judge
Fannie Mae’s charter gives the company the power “to sue and to be sued, and to complain and to defend, in any court of competent jurisdiction, State or Federal.” 12 U.S.C. § 1723a(a). Unlike the corporate charter at issue in American National Red Cross v. S.G., 505 U.S. 247, 112 S.Ct. 2465, 120 L.Ed.2d 201 (1992), Fannie Mae’s sue-and-be-sued clause contains a proviso — the phrase “of competent jurisdiction.” The majority offers a few potential readings of this phrase, but each of these constructions effectively renders the proviso superfluous. But the phrase “of competent jurisdiction” is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.