Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard P. Haskins
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 25, 1974No. 72-2342PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE R. THOMPSON, District Judge.
This is an action in ejectment brought by the United States to enforce its right to possession of an area in the Angeles National Forest near Los Angeles, California, described as Section 28, T. 3 N., R. 14 W., San Bernardino B & M.
The Complaint alleges that defendant, Richard P. Haskins, claims the right to possess the property by virtue of four invalidated mining claims denominated as Lone Jack, Lap Wing, Roger Williams and Lady Helen, and two invalidated millsites called Lap Wing Millsite and Lady Helen Millsite. The claims in question were located…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Iron Silver Mining Co. v. CheesmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoefler v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Virginia RussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Hiram B. Webb v. Manuel LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. LangleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1984
- United States v. Billy Joe Bagwell Cynthia BagwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.