Legal Opinion
Farm-Aero Service Inc. v. Henning Produce Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 27, 1975No. 1 CA-CIV 2239PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Judge.
This appeal questions the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence to support a jury verdict.
Appellant, Farm-Aero Service Inc., is an Arizona corporation engaged in aerial crop dusting. Appellees are produce growers with farming operations in western Maricopa County. During October 1969, an aerial applicator plane sprayed defoliant over appellees’ lettuce fields causing significant damage. The growers claimed that the aircraft was owned and operated by Farm-Aero. Farm-Aero denied the allegation. During the trial which followed, appellees produced circumstantial evidence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HarvillArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- New York Life Insurance v. McNeelyArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Curtis v. Boquillas Land & Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1904
- Avechuco v. AwtreyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- City of Tucson v. SandersonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Richard W. Neely v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company and Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Mobilisa, Inc. v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Andrews v. Fry's Food Stores of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Benson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.