Russell v. Russell
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
In Equity. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, District Judge.1
The purpose of this bill is to set aside an antenuptial agreement on the ground of fraud. The complainant, Lottie R. Russell, is the widow of John Russell, late of Leesburg, N. J., deceased, to whom she was married November 30, 1892, and who died July 20, 1897. Mr. Russell was 75 at the time of the marriage, and Mrs. Russell 50, and both had been previously married. Mr. Russell had no children living, but had three grandchildren; and Mrs. Russell had two adult sons, George R. and Grant Brown. By the antenuptial agreement, which was executed November 22d, a few days…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Pierce v. . PierceNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Potter v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Billings v. Aspen Mining & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Levy v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Smith & Wesson Brands Inc v. Attorney General New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- Gordon v. MunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Eloesser-Heynemann Co. v. Bayly-Underhill Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1928
- Stotler v. StotlerPreble County Court of Common Pleas · 1916