Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Munn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1912No. 17,725PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

A statement in the opinion that the rents and profits of the property set apart to the wife by the antenuptial contract had been absorbed by taxes is challenged in a petition for rehearing. On reexamining the evidence it is found that although the taxes upon one of the tracts exceeded the rent, the reverse is true of the other parcel. Concerning this subject the appellee’s brief contained the following:

“The North Topeka property produced a little income and was worth in 1898 about $1800, but, at the time of the death of Mr. Gordon, by reason…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pierce v. . PierceNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Johnston v. . SpicerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Gordon v. MunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Buffington v. BuffingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hastings v. DickinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Dunsworth v. DunsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. McCaslin v. WillisMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Berns v. BernsOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Sheridan v. DaviesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API