Legal Opinion
Lah v. Shell Oil Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 2, 1970No. 7045PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOGAN, District Judge.
The second amended complaint in this case claims violations of Sections 1 and 2 of Title 15 U.S.C.A. It is claimed that the defendant has engaged in tying practices and the exercise of dominating power in an attempt to monopolize an *199appreciable part of commerce and/or to restrain an appreciable portion of trade or commerce. Specifically, it is claimed that Shell basically controls the sale of a product, Shell gasoline, which is sufficiently attractive in and of itself to enable Shell to condition its sale to one who is agreeable to entering into short-term (one…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Moscarelli v. StammDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Thomas E. Foster and Georgia Lee Foster, and Cross-Appellants v. City of Detroit, Michigan, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1967
- Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Guste v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Abercrombie v. Lum's Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
- Morris v. BurchardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Bob Maxfield, Inc. v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Donson Stores, Inc. v. American Bakeries Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.