Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Schwaebe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1927No. 5257PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing the bill of complaint and denying injunctive relief in a suit against the collector of customs.

The Tariff Act of 1922 provides that all vehicles seized under the provisions of the eustom laws shall be placed and remain in the custody of the collector for the district in which the seizure was made, to await dis■position according to law; that the collect- or shall require the appraiser to determine the domestic value, at the time and place of appraisement, of any vehicle so seized; that if such value, i*etumed by the appraiser,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rice v. Walls, U.S. Dist. Atty. Puckett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  2. In Re No. 32 East Sixty-Seventh StreetCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. Willis v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  4. KingUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API