Legal Opinion

McClung v. Sewell Valley Railroad

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MilleR, Judge:

Plaintiffs bill prays for an injunction to restrain and enjoin the defendant railroad company from constructing and operating a railroad along the way claimed by defendant on plaintiff’s lands, and that it be restrained from further trespass on his lands, and from obstructing Little Clear Creek; and that it be required to remove from the bed of said creek obstructions already placed therein by it in the construction of its roadbed; and the further prayer of the bill is that a certain deed from the Meadow River Lumber Company to ■defendant be cancelled as a cloud on plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Uhl v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Watts v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ambler v. LeachWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Tennant's Heirs v. FrettsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Gilbert v. McCrearyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. NurnbergerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Johnston v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. BNSF Railway Co. v. Chevron Midcontinent, L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API