Legal Opinion

Bell v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1974No. Civ. No. 41634PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

Maritime personal injury case. Plaintiff Garland Bell brought an action based on theories of negligence under the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 688; 45 U.S.C. § 51) and unseaworthiness under general maritime law, against defendant Seatrain Lines, Incorporated. The trial *19court directed a verdict in favor of defendant on the Jones Act count;1 the jury brought in a verdict in favor of defendant on the unseaworthiness theory. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict.

Facts

Plaintiff, in January 1968, was an assistant engineer on the S.S. Sea-train Savannah, a cargo ship…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Guerra v. Handlery Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fierro v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Haith v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API